RGRA reconstructs only what is provable.
Non-provable claims remain explicitly non-locked.
Trigger
RGRA is typically engaged after an incident exists, but before conclusions harden.
The trigger is rarely a technical failure alone. It is the moment when:
RGRA is brought in to answer only that — in writing — before narrative replaces evidence.
RGRA produces one coherent evidentiary chain, or explicitly records why such a chain cannot yet exist.
Illustrative format only. No assurance or opinion is provided.
Operating stance
Interface drift, mixed clocks, contradictory logs.
Verbal go-aheads and non-traceable execution.
Operational ambiguity reframed as certainty.
Records prepared for executive and evidentiary review.
If this page resonates immediately, pressure is already present.
It usually appears quietly — through parallel records, unresolved handovers, or incompatible explanations of the same event.
By the time it becomes visible, options are already constrained.
No dashboards.
No templates.
No system access.
This work operates exclusively on written records and defensible reconstruction.
Once the written record diverges, alignment does not self-correct.
This work is intentionally limited in scope and engagement count.